Which statement describes the void deadline differences between GDS and IAR for holiday scenarios?

Which statement describes the void deadline differences between GDS and IAR for holiday scenarios?

• A. GDS uses ET; IAR uses local time
• B. GDS uses local time; IAR uses ET
• C. GDS uses ET; IAR uses ET
• D. GDS uses local time; IAR uses ET

Answer: (D)

Void deadlines depend on the time reference each system uses. For GDS, the deadline is tied to the local time zone of the market or station involved, so agents see deadlines in their local context. IAR, on the other hand, standardizes deadlines using Eastern Time, providing a single reference across all markets. In holiday scenarios, this difference means GDS reflects local time while IAR uses ET, which is why that statement is correct. Using ET for GDS would disconnect from local market timing, and using local time for IAR would remove a consistent, worldwide standard.

Void deadlines depend on the time reference each system uses. For GDS, the deadline is tied to the local time zone of the market or station involved, so agents see deadlines in their local context. IAR, on the other hand, standardizes deadlines using Eastern Time, providing a single reference across all markets. In holiday scenarios, this difference means GDS reflects local time while IAR uses ET, which is why that statement is correct. Using ET for GDS would disconnect from local market timing, and using local time for IAR would remove a consistent, worldwide standard.